3 ms·
You have very valid points all around - but allow me to push on some of them a bit. Even though Google's tech was built without VC, their consumer product and
by askafriend 9y ago
You have very valid points all around - but allow me to push on some of them a bit.
Even though Google's tech was built without VC, their consumer product and fundamental business were far from built and people had written off the entire web search space by that time anyway. It's kind of like if someone came to you today and pitched you something like food delivery with a better algorithm when nearly all major food delivery services today aren't doing so well and people have already developed strong biases against the space.
AirBnB isn't only a short-term home rental market though - it's a bit more cavalier of a product than that. Short term home rental does definitely exist on AirBnB and is huge but AirBnB also encompasses the spectrum between staying on someone's couch and straight up short-term home rental. The other difference is that it also covered massive areas that were traditionally ignored by hotels and other short-term home rental services. So in that sense, the VC money was needed to market the product appropriately, build trust with users through insurance guarantees, build liquidity in areas where it was a competitive advantage and do the legal/lobbying legwork. That's the real magic and that couldn't have been accomplished through a traditional finances first approach and certainly couldn't have grown so large so fast. Let me put it this way: whether AirBnB ended up as a cute hipster alternative to VRBO (which was playing in a tiny market) or whether AirBnB ended up as a straight-up hotel-alternative depended on VC money to believe.
- ThomPete 9y agoThe market is literally filled with companies that started with finance first and then grew more and more powerful. Furthermore Airbnb is actually finances first as they had a business model from day #1 they weren't actually using VC money to find it first. And google had their secret sauce before they got the funding. The discussion I was trying to start though wasn't that you should never get funding but rather that way too many companies in my view uses funding when they don't really need it and instead could just start to charge. By charging you are also more likely to solve an actual problem need people have rather than just giving the first fix for free.