4 ms·
I think the key issue here is that when a government imposes administrative procedures on its citizens (e.g. tax returns), it should be entirely logical for sai
by daveungerer 16y ago
I think the key issue here is that when a government imposes administrative procedures on its citizens (e.g. tax returns), it should be entirely logical for said government to provide free software that reduces the administrative load. In fact, this should be the norm. You can't accuse the state of anti-competitive behaviour in this case, because the market you're serving wouldn't even exist if they hadn't created tax filing procedures to begin with.
Or, as I like to think of it, governments, by necessity, introduce a certain amount of friction into our lives, and have every right to try and reduce that friction. If your business is built on reducing that friction, you simply need to ensure that your service stays ahead of the free service, because your profits are not a right.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- btilly 16y agoYour "clarification" is incorrect. The article claims that the cost of this software is paid for by the fact that tax returns that use this software cost the government less to process than alternatives. So there is nothing but a win here for the taxpayers, they get to save time and money. Of course Intuit isn't happy because they don't get to make a profit on a product that nobody wants to buy.