3 ms·

>A big reason some users dislike ads isn't because of their entire existance but rather their tendency as of late to be malware-ridden or cause drops in webpage

>A big reason some users dislike ads isn't because of their entire existance but rather their tendency as of late to be malware-ridden or cause drops in webpage performance. These are the things that cause some users to enable ad-blockers, and Brave is the only way I've heard of that has pushed the envelope of a BETTER ad experience. AdBlock Plus also does something equivalent through their default option to show "Unobtrusive ads."

InitialLastName 9y ago
The problem with AdBlock Plus is that, as far as I can tell, the way to get on their "unobtrusive ads" list isn't to actually be "unobtrusive" to any meaningful standard, it's to pay them to qualify you as unobtrusive.
- zaarn 9y ago
  That's not my experience with ABP. So far I haven't found any actually obtrusive ads and as far as I am concerned, they are holding up a good standard.
  - Vogtinator 9y ago
    That doesn't have anything to do with experience, that's just a fact. Advertisers pay ABP to get on the list.
    - zaarn 9y ago
      Yeah but that doesn't change the fact about the requirements to even be able to pay to get on the list.
      - baq 9y ago
        It's a trust issue in summary. You either trust them to do a good job at screening or not.
- PhasmaFelis 9y ago
  IIRC, you pay them (not a lot) to check out your ads and verify that they are, in fact, unobtrusive. I realize it's distasteful that money changes hands at all, but I can imagine it takes a non-trivial amount of person-hours to vet these things on a large scale, and it should be easy enough to tell if they're crooked or not just by using ABP and seeing if the permitted ads are intrusive.
  - InitialLastName 9y ago
    When I used it (until after their ad whitelisting came in), I found that they did a poor job of blocking obtrusive ads, then. Either that, or their standards for "unobtrusive" were low. I switched to a better adblocker, so now I just whitelist sites whose ads I'm willing to see.

InitialLastName 9y ago

The problem with AdBlock Plus is that, as far as I can tell, the way to get on their "unobtrusive ads" list isn't to actually be "unobtrusive" to any meaningful standard, it's to pay them to qualify you as unobtrusive.

zaarn 9y ago
That's not my experience with ABP. So far I haven't found any actually obtrusive ads and as far as I am concerned, they are holding up a good standard.
- Vogtinator 9y ago
  That doesn't have anything to do with experience, that's just a fact. Advertisers pay ABP to get on the list.
  - zaarn 9y ago
    Yeah but that doesn't change the fact about the requirements to even be able to pay to get on the list.
    - baq 9y ago
      It's a trust issue in summary. You either trust them to do a good job at screening or not.
PhasmaFelis 9y ago
IIRC, you pay them (not a lot) to check out your ads and verify that they are, in fact, unobtrusive. I realize it's distasteful that money changes hands at all, but I can imagine it takes a non-trivial amount of person-hours to vet these things on a large scale, and it should be easy enough to tell if they're crooked or not just by using ABP and seeing if the permitted ads are intrusive.
- InitialLastName 9y ago
  When I used it (until after their ad whitelisting came in), I found that they did a poor job of blocking obtrusive ads, then. Either that, or their standards for "unobtrusive" were low. I switched to a better adblocker, so now I just whitelist sites whose ads I'm willing to see.