3 ms·
But I agree the cost is often not significant to companies, yet. Legislation and company costs are going to ramp up though, the pooch is getting screwed too oft
by hackerfromthefu 9y ago
But I agree the cost is often not significant to companies, yet. Legislation and company costs are going to ramp up though, the pooch is getting screwed too often, and publicly ..
Equifax CEO, CIO, CSO all gone, and may be done for insider trading ..
http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/19/technology/equifax-legal-issues/index.html http://money.cnn.com/2017/09/19/technology/equifax-legal-iss...
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/350634-ftc-launches-investigation-into-equifax-breach http://thehill.com/policy/technology/350634-ftc-launches-inv...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-15/another-equifax-coverup-did-company-scrub-its-chief-security-officer-was-music-major http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-09-15/another-equifax-cov...
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 9y agoThe insider trading is orthogonal to the issue of security policy though. Companies shed C levels all the time for a wide variety of reasons, it isn't that big a cost on the whole.