4 ms·
There are ways to have comments that are a lot less awful than Disqus.
by magicmikexxl 9y ago
There are ways to have comments that are a lot less awful than Disqus.
- spiderfarmer 9y agoI scanned the article to see if it was interesting enough to dive into the details, but when I saw the Disqus plugin I closed the tab. What's the point of dropping Adsense if you keep the Disqus plugin?
- burntwater 9y agoSimple, they value the discussion capabilities provided by Disqus. Disqus was worth keeping, Adsense was not.
- spiderfarmer 9y agoThat’s my point exactly. Did they do the same exercise for Disqus? Or did they get all scientific on evaluating Adsense, and go with a “hunch” for Disqus? That’s like saying “Marlboro cigarettes are harmful, here’s proof, let’s grab a pack of Lucky Strikes and discuss”.
- gwern 9y agoIt's more like smoking two brands of cigarettes and then deciding to stop half your smoking; that is surely an improvement... This is just whataboutism. AdSense should be judged on its own merits, and it fails badly: it does nothing I want (aside from delivering quite small amounts of money) at an unacceptable cost. Maybe Disqus is also bad but I would have to ponder how much I want commenting and how to deal with the extant corpus of comments and in any case, at the moment I am gearing up for another ad test to try to figure out what about AdSense is so harmful (and help convince the doubters that there is an effect at all), so I can't test Disqus without complicating things a lot.
- gwern 9y agoWhich are and which work with a static Hakyll site?
- snthd 9y agoMaybe https://coralproject.net/products/talk.html https://coralproject.net/products/talk.html
- gwern 9y agoThat seems to require you to host your own server and doesn't look much better in terms of complexity.
- KajMagnus 9y agoSee my comment nearby about EffectiveDiscussions — it's a new commenting system, open source, & there's hosting. (https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments if you didn't find my other comment) (What did you mean with "look ... in terms of complexity"? You mean how-complicated-it-is-to-install?)
- pault 9y agoI don't like Disqus mostly because the UX is clunky. Are there other things people dislike about it?
- Freak_NL 9y agoBeing tracked by a single third party on every site that uses it comes to mind.
- Bartweiss 9y agoThis is UX-ish, but I regularly have login/posting issues and very slow loading times off Disqus.
- KajMagnus 9y agoDisqus shows ads, unless you pay like $10/month. (& tracks your visitors, like someone else mentioned.) Maybe you would instead like the looks of EffectiveDiscussions — it's a new commenting system I'm developing. See my other comment nearby (or, if you didn't find it, go to: https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments ).
- cisanti 9y agoCommenting system for static site please? Meaning I don't have to host anything dynamic myself and the price won't kill you.
- KajMagnus 9y agoEffectiveDiscussions is a new alternative this year 2017. It's open source, or hosting for $2/month. (I'm developing it.) Demo: https://www.kajmagnus.blog/new-embedded-comments https://www.kajmagnus.blog/new-embedded-comments (That's a static website built with Gatsby.) Read more about it: https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments https://www.effectivediscussions.org/blog-comments (landing page, not finished) Since it's new, it's a bit risky: maybe some bugs. & has some novel features, inspired by HackerNews actually: https://www.effectivediscussions.org/-32/how-hacker-news-can-be-improved-3-things https://www.effectivediscussions.org/-32/how-hacker-news-can... (but that's not totally ported to embedded-comments yet). Currently implementing single-sign-on.