3 ms·
I get your point but I wish this wasn't the case with most research. I, like the author, am not a math guy but have been reading tons of ML papers recently. I u
by asadlionpk 9y ago
I get your point but I wish this wasn't the case with most research. I, like the author, am not a math guy but have been reading tons of ML papers recently. I usually skip the formal definition parts and get to the 'juicy' implementation parts.
I wish there was a ELI5 section in each paper.
- skiman10 9y agoWhat have been your favorite papers so far?
- asadlionpk 9y agoThat's hard as I haven't read too many. The recent deepmind papers (the ones about imagination) were good. The papers were pretty standard but they came along with explanatory blogpost[1] and some videos covered them too[2][3][4]. This supplementary content is what made them accessible for me. [1] https://deepmind.com/blog/agents-imagine-and-plan/ https://deepmind.com/blog/agents-imagine-and-plan/ [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp-YOPcjkFw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp-YOPcjkFw [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agXIYMCICcc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agXIYMCICcc [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56GW1IlWgMg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56GW1IlWgMg