3 ms·
That’s just false. That would be true only if the “factual effects” were agreed upon. Let me give you an example: Pro immigration advocates claim immigration
by projectramo 9y ago
That’s just false.
That would be true only if the “factual effects” were agreed upon.
Let me give you an example:
Pro immigration advocates claim immigration will increase US jobs. So do anti immigration activists.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> That would be true only if the “factual effects” were agreed upon. No, he fact that there is a conflict of values which includes a fundamental disagreement on which facts are relevant and how the same facts would weigh in desirability is true independent of whether there is agreement on the facts of the economic effects of immigration (there isn't, but the fact remains that the dispute on policy is largely not about facts, but goals.)