2 ms·
I don't think software 2.0 is a good name, because I don't think the programs we write right now and neural nets are that comparable. They're more complementar
by chubot 9y ago
I don't think software 2.0 is a good name, because I don't think the programs we write right now and neural nets are that comparable.
They're more complementary than overlapping. It's something new in the toolkit, not something that replaces existing programs.