3 ms·
Hi, yes, I made it non-conmutative to make it a little bit more difficult, I think you don't get to see a non conmutative algebra in high school, it was a way t
by Vargas 16y ago
Hi, yes, I made it non-conmutative to make it a little bit more difficult, I think you don't get to see a non conmutative algebra in high school, it was a way to take her out of her comfort area.
However you made a sligth mistake with the shifting part:
"The set part of the new object will be the union of the two sets with all the letters shifted as many places as specified by the integer part of the second TIAM object."
I think you are shifting a little bit too much.
- wcarss 16y agoaha! I interpreted "the second TIAM object" as "the new TIAM object", as opposed to the second of the original objects. Thank you for the clarification :)
- todayiamme 16y agoI learned something just the same. Thanks a lot!
- todayiamme 16y agoOh. I just noticed it right now. I should have done it on paper and worked out it out more extensively. Is there anything else conceptually wrong in my reply? Also, is there any way at all I can contact you? I would love to learn more from you. If possible can you please drop me a line at yesthisisananonymousid at gmail?