3 ms·
I get 23 on a beastly desktop with dual GeForce 980Ti. Not bad for 1.8 million particles!
by BatFastard 9y ago
I get 23 on a beastly desktop with dual GeForce 980Ti. Not bad for 1.8 million particles!
- onion2k 9y ago17fps with 712000 particles on a Nexus 6P. That's really impressive.
- PuffinBlue 9y agoThat's pretty good! Get between 11-29 fps at 753620 particles on Galaxy s7, mostly sits at 16 or 17fps though. I wonder what an iPhone would get, I'm led to believe their GPUs are pretty strong (to say the least).
- PuffinBlue 9y agoI get 23 fps at 1.8 million particles with a single gtx1070. Well, 17-24 fps but sits mostly at 23. Quite interesting to see the comparison between generations. EDIT - The above was in Chrome. In Firefox I actually get 23/24 fps at 4k (3.83M particles). At 1.8M in Firefox I get 48-50fps. Pretty good from Firefox. Doesn't seem hardware limited, CPU and GPU utilisation doesn't go above 20% and I'm running other stuff like a decent sized VM and some other programmes. I really don't know much about WASM. Would these numbers be deemed good? Is there more performance to squeezed out? I'm guessing there is as it's not fully utilising the hardware?
- avisaven 9y agoThat's odd, I'm running on a Macbook with an Intel Iris Pro integrated graphics card and I'm getting 60FPS. Using Chromium 62.0.3202.89 (Developer Build) (64-bit) though. https://i.imgur.com/wbiUT5l.jpg https://i.imgur.com/wbiUT5l.jpg EDIT: Ah just noticed I'm only using 586k particles.