3 ms·
The term doesn't make sense because you're not going to use groups of 8 qubits to represent characters on a screen. We may actually need a new word for 2 qubit
by mtgx 9y ago
The term doesn't make sense because you're not going to use groups of 8 qubits to represent characters on a screen.
We may actually need a new word for 2 qubits (dual-qubits? dubits?) because it seems 2 qubits are enough to break 1-bit of encryption, and I think I've read it's enough to simulate 1 atom, too.
- colejohnson66 9y agoI thought it was x qubits is equal to 2^x classical bits? So wouldn’t 2 “dubits” actually be four times (not twice as) better?