3 ms·
Yes, these videos are bad. The reasons are clearly listed in the article and the video in it. "5 years old and watching Spiderman rape & murder Elsa" is never
by yzmtf2008 9y ago
Yes, these videos are bad. The reasons are clearly listed in the article and the video in it.
"5 years old and watching Spiderman rape & murder Elsa" is never something you should let a child watch. I'm sorry, but this is not something Pollock would ever cover. This is child pornography level of stuff. Or, are you saying that is also something perfectly fine for any audience?
I'm really amazed by the mental gymnastics one has to perform to compare these videos to Pollock and Rock and Roll.
- donatj 9y agoExplain the actual harm. Enumerate it. I get that you don’t personally like it, and thus don’t want your child to watch it, but do you think it’s going to make your child a rapist?
- yzmtf2008 9y agoI'll cite a fellow HN user: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15674870 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15674870 Or this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15674305 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15674305 Or how about this medium article? https://medium.com/@jamesbridle/something-is-wrong-on-the-internet-c39c471271d2 https://medium.com/@jamesbridle/something-is-wrong-on-the-in... Many people have presented their case on this issue. In this thread or elsewhere. Please don't pretend they don't exist by saying "Explain the actual harm. Enumerate it." Where's your proof that these videos are harmless or even beneficial to children?
- donatj 9y agoAgain, you are only proving the Elvis moral panic argument. Other commentators agreeing with you doesn’t make a case.
- yzmtf2008 9y agoI'm sorry, but this is not just "Other commentators agreeing with you". Those arguments are, in fact, sufficient for me to believe that these videos are harmful to children.