This is nothing even close to regulatory capture. It may not be a good thing, but you can't just throw random terms at it and expect them to work... This poli

This is nothing even close to regulatory capture. It may not be a good thing, but you can't just throw random terms at it and expect them to work... This policy has a) nothing to do with regulators or a regulatory agency, and b) is not a result of a regulated industry subverting the agent of it's regulation. Also, the 100k cap you're complaining about already exists. I'm not sure what your rant even means at this point.