6 ms·
not necessarily. The convergence point can be and will probably be sub-optimal if we keep doing this without a mathematical framework guiding us.
by inverse_pi 9y ago
not necessarily. The convergence point can be and will probably be sub-optimal if we keep doing this without a mathematical framework guiding us.
- zardo 9y agoSo long as you never stop trying random things, you are guaranteed to find a global optimum... as time->inf Not a very useful guarantee, but that's theoretical guarantees for you.