not only has there not been a documented falsehood that WL propagated, but there has not been an example of something leaked to them that was subsequently withh

not only has there not been a documented falsehood that WL propagated, but there has not been an example of something leaked to them that was subsequently withheld due to an agenda. Unless you have evidence of either of these two things happening, you will not change my opinion that they are a force for openness in a very opaque political scene. The fact that they release more that is anti-whatever says more about who is leaking than it does about WL.