3 ms·
It would be interesting to put this in numbers. Now a bunch of people with quite a good amount of ETH have their accounts frozen. Of course (I assume) they'd v
by ecesena 9y ago
It would be interesting to put this in numbers.
Now a bunch of people with quite a good amount of ETH have their accounts frozen. Of course (I assume) they'd vote for a change that allows unblocking these accounts. Incidentally, who created the bug is also inside this group (if I'm not wrong).
Questions are:
1. what should the community as a whole think, to change and unlock, or to not allow any change?
2. what would the power of the community be wrt to these bigs, it this was Tezos?
- dlwdlw 9y agoI think some sort of painful event is necessary for certain types of change. Like the Titanic encouraging safer ship specifications and processes. Contract safety needs to vastly improve before smart contracts can be relied on. Forks should only happen IMO when all sides have merit, when each side is right in their own way. The DAO situation may be justified in that not doing so would have damaged the community too much. Like forcing a kid to forget truly traumatic events but letting them remember broken arms while skateboarding. Once a child grows up though all actions are irreversible and there is no longer a parent figure to ameliorate mistakes. I'm uncertain what "age" to consider ethereum but I'd tentatively consider it a pre-teen skateboarding incident.