This seems like an unjust outcome. Shouldn't there be enough latitude for bankruptcy judges that they can respond to unusual situations such as the value of the

This seems like an unjust outcome. Shouldn't there be enough latitude for bankruptcy judges that they can respond to unusual situations such as the value of the assets rising to the point that everybody is earning money on the bankruptcy? Should Karpeles really be made a near-billionaire because he presided over the theft of hundreds of millions of dollars of other people's money?