3 ms·
If the rules "are there for a reason" then black cabs would be obviously superior and wouldn't be at a competitive disadvantage. So, obviously those rules don'
by zlynx 9y ago
If the rules "are there for a reason" then black cabs would be obviously superior and wouldn't be at a competitive disadvantage.
So, obviously those rules don't matter as much to customers as convenience, price and availability do.
- Silhouette 9y agoIf the rules "are there for a reason" then black cabs would be obviously superior and wouldn't be at a competitive disadvantage. In some ways, black cabs are obviously superior. To pick a few examples, their pricing is regulated by local authorities, they are required to be wheelchair accessible, and their drivers are required to have The Knowledge along with various other qualifications before being licensed. To the extent that black cabs may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to Uber's standard (non-surge) pricing, that is in part because Uber's current financial model seems to be subsidising every journey using the vast amounts of funding they have accepted. That is not sustainable. It is also in part because of exactly the sort of issues we're talking about today, where they've been cutting their costs at the expense of their drivers in legally questionable ways, which again is hardly playing on a level field.
- candiodari 9y agoHaving driven one of them you forgot: * Rude * Will demand payment in cash, and only when you threaten them with non-payment repeatedly will allow you to pay with credit cards, DESPITE agreeing to it beforehand. * Unwilling to stop where the customer wants them to * Don't get out of the car to put luggage in the trunk I hate Uber's labour practices, but there are major issues with black cabs.