3 ms·
> It's not a family friendliness issue causing this, it's an 'advertiser friendliness' one. What's the difference? In my mind those are the same thing.
by FussyZeus 9y ago
> It's not a family friendliness issue causing this, it's an 'advertiser friendliness' one.
What's the difference? In my mind those are the same thing.
- ghaff 9y agoWhile you don't have any inherent right to, in practice you can post a pretty wide range of content to YouTube without charge. But certainly no one has an obligation to pay you for that just like no one has an obligation to pay you for writing a blog on pretty much any topic you desire.
- scott_s 9y agoI watch a lot of video game content that is advertiser friendly (a conclusion I make since I see ads before it), but is not "family friendly."
- imron 9y agoTake something like the Rubin Report [0], which is reasonably family friendly but that covers socially/politically controversial topics and/or speakers. Not too long ago, a large amount of their back catalog was demonetized. It's not 'advertiser friendly' because sometimes even just the presence of a controversial speaker is enough to bring a hate mob down on anyone advertising on a video with them in it. 0: https://twitter.com/RubinReport https://twitter.com/RubinReport