> earned credit toward proof of work in my example they both did work, they didn't yield any proof of it. > Say I swap in a universal simulation from the Big

> earned credit toward proof of work in my example they both did work, they didn't yield any proof of it. > Say I swap in a universal simulation from the Big Bang instead of SHA2 if you have an idea - express it in pseudocode. what is your `f(candidate)` here? what is the return value? how does return value ties in "is candidate valid" and "simulation data" in a way that prohibits modifying source code to only do "is candidate valid" part? you're trying to handwave your way through some of the most complex questions in computing. "what if we just swap sha2 for blah, where blah is something that solves humanity's problems" - well sure, let's do this, show me the code. > Why would incentive drop to zero to search the space? because the axiom we're operating with is: though shalt not run ledger security code without "useful" code. as soon as the problem is solved - nobody secures the ledger anymore. > why you’re scare quoting important because you're forcing upon me what i should consider important problems humanity has to solve. your opinion is that distributed ledger isn't one of them. your opinion is wrong.