4 ms·
That is the justification for the much maligned forfeiture laws. Without them, or some other lawsuit, yes they are his.
by asmithmd1 9y ago
That is the justification for the much maligned forfeiture laws. Without them, or some other lawsuit, yes they are his.
- gambiting 9y agoOk, so just for example - if I steal your car, hide it so no one can find it, go to prison for a year or two, get out.....the car is mine? Or a phone, or money, or pretty much literally anything else? A stolen property remains stolen until it's returned to its owner, it doesn't transfer ownership just because the thief served time.
- amdavidson 9y agoNo, it does not magically transfer ownership, but for what crime would you be prosecuted? You've already done time for stealing the car.
- TomMarius 9y agoFor not returning the stolen car and using a stolen item? That's not illegal in the US? (European here)
- lightbyte 9y agoAre you not stealing it again at that point? I'd guess that you would be charged for a similar crime, just at a different date.
- astura 9y agoThe judge will almost certainly order the return of the car (or a cash restitution) as part of the sentencing. If you don't return the car or don't pay the restitution you are in contempt of court. More so, "possession of stolen property" is also a crime. The car doesn't magically become unstolen just because the theft went to jail.
- astura 9y agoWhat? No. Possessing stolen property is a crime. This has absolutely nothing to do with civil forfeiture. Civil forfeiture is when the getaway car is seized when you are robbing a bank. Restitution is when you are ordered by a court to repay the victim for their losses that your criminal behavior caused. This case involved restitution, if he didn't comply with giving up the private keys he would be ordered to pay restitution. Civil forfeiture doesn't impact restitution.