3 ms·
Maybe someone does think the guy hasn’t been paid enough and is deliberately providing a justification for “damages”
by eecc 9y ago
Maybe someone does think the guy hasn’t been paid enough and is deliberately providing a justification for “damages”
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- jstanley 9y agoPerhaps he's been paid enough in the past to cover their usage of his music in the past, but he's not being paid enough in the present to cover their usage of his music in the present.
- Nition 9y agoWhat eecc is suggesting is that some insider at Dove was unhappy with how much the musician earned from royalties, and so deliberately stopped paying them while leaving the campaign up to allow Benn Jordan to sue and therefore gain a greater share in the end. I think that's extremely unlikely myself but the comment may have been made in jest.
- jstanley 9y agoOK. I read it to mean eecc thought Benn Jordan thought Benn Jordan hadn't been paid enough, and has written all the "this is what I signed up for, I'm happy with the amount I was getting" spiel as a way to prepare to seek damages without appearing to act in bad faith.