3 ms·
> why convert HTTP into an HTTP-like protocol which is neither as well-standardised nor as well-documented? I have these same feelings every time I see uWSGI b
by deathanatos 9y ago
> why convert HTTP into an HTTP-like protocol which is neither as well-standardised nor as well-documented?
I have these same feelings every time I see uWSGI being used.
- icebraining 9y agoThe protocol is uwsgi, whereas uWSGI is the application, which doesn't have to use uwsgi :D