3 ms·

There seems to be evidence that the Clinton emails released by Wikileaks were edited before release. This would conflict with their stated goals and I think is

• throwahey 9y ago
  There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that (outside of the Clinton camp and Podesta) and given Wikileaks track record, it's highly unlikely.
  • willstrafach 9y ago
    I think some wires are being crossed here, as there has been recent evidence of modifications to earlier leaks from Guccifer 2.0 of DNC documents. These were not published by WL but they are often grouped with WL due to Guccifer 2.0 claiming to be a WL source
• yahnonono 9y ago
  "There seems to be evidence that the Clinton emails released by Wikileaks were edited before release." [citation needed] For many/most of the released emails, there is evidence that they were NOT edited prior to release. The emails have a DKIM signature. Unless you are claiming that Google's private keys were misused, the emails simply WERE NOT EDITED. Additionally, there is NO EVIDENCE of a suspicious pattern of emails not being signed. So please, provide a citation for "evidence that the Clinton emails released by Wikileaks were edited before release". Because the only evidence I'm aware of is evidence which clearly demonstrates the emails COULD NOT HAVE BEEN ALTERED BY WIKILEAKS.