I find it quite ironic that the author at one point complains of misleading tags being used in titles to generate clickbait (or 'searchbait') in an article that

I find it quite ironic that the author at one point complains of misleading tags being used in titles to generate clickbait (or 'searchbait') in an article that awkwardly shoe-horned in "self-driving" into a couple of sentences to artificially generate additional clicks. It's currently the "top story" on Google from Bloomberg for "self driving." Actually ironic is not the most accurate word. It's telling. This is another article which is essentially a call to censorship. And what's to be censored? Well like most of these articles, that's not really discussed beyond whatever the author happens to disagree with. You see, jamming in misleading tags to produce hits isn't a problem when it benefits the author or their publication, but when others do it? Oh, it's time for a serious conversation now.