I don’t understand the point of this article. I found Bridle’s original piece to be much ado about nothing. He basically complains about algorithmicly generated

I don’t understand the point of this article. I found Bridle’s original piece to be much ado about nothing. He basically complains about algorithmicly generated content being too “weird” for kids then does English lit style analysis looking for malicious undertones in said content. I didn’t agree with it at all but at least it was an original blog post that was trying to make a point. This Bloomberg piece on the other hand simply links to Bridle’s blog and says “Yeah! What that guy said!”. Really thin “content” imo.