4 ms·

These are up to 10 year old tools, they are not going to still be in use.

• codefined 9y ago
  In the commercial sector I seem to find myself spending a significant amount of my time working on projects that were started many decades ago that have just been improved over time. I honestly wouldn't be too surprised if a lot of these applications were used today with relatively little change.
  • lightbyte 9y ago
    This isn't the commercial sector, these kinds of things are incredibly sensitive to time.
    • ryanlol 9y ago
      Huh, why? We aren't really discussing exploits here.
• 45h34jh53k4j 9y ago
  Repo is from 2015. Its not that old.
  • lightbyte 9y ago
    Read the page, they moved to a new repos a few years ago. If you go to the actual source files some of them are dated as early as October 1st 2007.
    • 45h34jh53k4j 9y ago
      They moved from a CVS/SVN repo to git. The history from this old repo is missing, but the (leaked) git repo is recent. Author:User#142 Date: Fri Oct 30 09:58:22 2015 EDT User's Guide date corrections.
• sametmax 9y ago
  Given that some big exploits can fly under the radar for decades (e.g: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/linux_kernel_gets_patch_against_12yearold_bug/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/23/linux_kernel_gets_p...), I think it's always interesting. But the point is moot anyway: either their tools are still relevant today, in that case it's good to see what they can use against the people, or they are not, in which case it won't hurt them if we see them and it's not "anti american".