3 ms·
You don't need photorealistic images for these situations. The images are always downsampled to a smaller resolution. So getting "good enough" but not photoreal
by bkberry352 9y ago
You don't need photorealistic images for these situations. The images are always downsampled to a smaller resolution. So getting "good enough" but not photorealistic is fine.
- minimaxir 9y agoIf you have software to simulate real-world physics for hundreds of independent agents that can be run on a personal computer with close to real world graphic fidelity (including realistic noise), you’re running a multibilion dollar company, not writing thought pieces on Medium.
- nl 9y agoThere are a few companies you can get simulation software from specifically designed for self-driving cars. See https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2017/10/26/self-driving-simulation/ https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2017/10/26/self-driving-simula... for some discussion. It's true that this isn't photo-realistic (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7OccC0W_CU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7OccC0W_CU for a video), but at the same time it is useful enough for training.