Two types of people: those who are willing to cross that line, and those who are brave enough to call the exception and dive into the moral greyzone when the ne

Two types of people: those who are willing to cross that line, and those who are brave enough to call the exception and dive into the moral greyzone when the need calls for it. I have trouble with the statement of this article. I'm not perfect. Through my experience, I've had times when I've blundered into that gray-zone, I've had times when I declined to cross that line. In the end, I think I've been pretty successful in my endeavors but the more experience I have the more I realize how many different paths there are to reach an end. And in hindsight, I'm most proud of getting things done by putting in that extra effort to think of a way to achieve something without undermining integrity. We're human so I think we've all had this experience but I think I'm mature enough now to have the patience and understanding that solid values coupled with work ethic can trump a lot more problems than a lot of people think. That said, I can understand the author's argument if what he means is that moral gray-zone of not right vs. wrong, but right vs. right decisions. Now that is a tough one. :-)