4 ms·
Yeah that's a good point, CoreCLR only has the single/main AppDomain code and Rotor was only 'sort of' .NET 2.0, but with a different GC and JIT. So without as
by matthewwarren 9y ago
Yeah that's a good point, CoreCLR only has the single/main AppDomain code and Rotor was only 'sort of' .NET 2.0, but with a different GC and JIT.
So without asking Don Syme himself we can only guess.
> I'm not sure if fullblown .Net CLR implementation was released yet
No and AFAIK they don't plan to. There's 'Reference Source' [0], but that's the Base class libraries only, not the CLR itself.
[0]: referencesource.microsoft.com
- Aloraman 9y agoI kinda guess this has something to do with System.__Canon type, which is a substitute type for open generic parameter type - there is no benefit in having different canon types per appdomain