3 ms·
> without even allowing for the possibility that women just actually are worse employees than men. Again, you're reading what you want to read.
by atom-morgan 9y ago
> without even allowing for the possibility that women just actually are worse employees than men.
Again, you're reading what you want to read.
- mfoy_ 9y agoHow else can you read "consistent differences in merit between subpopulations" when the context is gender discrimination in employee performance reviews?
- nnfy 9y agoMale, female, transgender, white, black, straight, homosexual, rich, poor, country of origin... Again, this is my point. Any time there is an overabundance of straight white males, and only straight white males, discrimination is presumed, with no actual evidence to suggest that these groups are equal in every task. You wouldn't argue that there are not systematic differences in physical performance between these various groups, but somehow cognitive performance, which is even more strongly influenced by environment and upbringing, is not allowed to be examined objectively.