A quick google immediately shows pages like this one [] which frets about sexism without including the words "stack" or "ranking." It has the usual citing of q

A quick google immediately shows pages like this one [] which frets about sexism without including the words "stack" or "ranking." It has the usual citing of questionable concepts like implicit bias, or the Bloomberg article's "unconscious bias." What I would like to know is, suppose you need to make a system in a large organization in an attempt to lay off your 10% worst employees. It's pretty reasonable to expect sexist rankings, even made by non-sexists, and to also expect beliefs by individuals, wrongly held, that their personal low rank was the result of sexism. How do you determine whether an organization's ranking system is sexist, in which direction, and by how much? [] https://blog.impraise.com/360-feedback/how-performance-reviews-are-reinforcing-gender-bias-5-steps-to-fight-against-it-performance-review https://blog.impraise.com/360-feedback/how-performance-revie... Edit: By non-sexists, I mean, like, non-garbage people.