> The creator had the option to choose a license that could have prevented this exact situation So, since any piece of code can potentially end up in a monitor

> The creator had the option to choose a license that could have prevented this exact situation So, since any piece of code can potentially end up in a monitoring, surveillance system, the only logical conclusion is we must kill BSD licensing. > and is perfectly happy with Intel's usage Not really: > Many people (including me) don't like the idea of an all-powerful management engine in there at all (since it is a possible security hole and a dangerous idea in the first place), but that is Intel's business decision and a separate issue from the code it runs.