3 ms·
3 C's: cost, convenience, and complexity. First, price. I think this is the biggest factor. You need a computer (for each TV). I don't think there are too many
by epicide 9y ago
3 C's: cost, convenience, and complexity.
First, price. I think this is the biggest factor. You need a computer (for each TV). I don't think there are too many computers (if any) in the $35-$150 range that can handle smoothly playing HD video and pushing it to an external display. Assuming the machine isn't dedicated and you already own it, it breaks point 2 below.
Second, I haven't seen a good setup for controlling a computer connected to a TV. Granted, I stopped looking a few years ago. For me (and I'd assume most people), "good setup" means ability to turn system on and control it remotely, at a minimum. I'm sure one exists, but it would definitely require even more hardware (cuts into price) and more custom setup.
Third, some people might not have the technical know-how to set up something that meets the above two things. Sure, plenty of us technical people can do it, but it's not hard to understand that we are the minority.
tl;dr there's nothing "wrong" with using a computer and an HDMI cable, but there are plenty of compelling reasons these days to use one of the ultra cheap boxes. They are basically cheap purpose-specific computers, anyway. Ultimately, different people have different needs and priorities.
- rhino369 9y agoI have an HTPC and I mostly just use it as a plex server, with plex player running on a roku. The Roku UI is infinitely better with a remote. I have a mini-keyboard with touch pad, but it is still inferior to a roku remote or my harmony remote. My wife won't use it.