3 ms·
You can't use "small details" to logically arrive a higher focus point. What use would humans have for intense detail, at a time when the world was far more dan
by katastic 9y ago
You can't use "small details" to logically arrive a higher focus point. What use would humans have for intense detail, at a time when the world was far more dangerous at range? And even then, 3,000 years ago is less than a blink of an eye in terms of evolution. Without more examples of humans actually "needing" intense, closer focus, there's no way (even with a 3,000 year evolution window) they'd evolve closer focus just for... art.
Occam's razor is rather applicable here. Magnification would be way easier and more available. Even a polished bent sword magnifies.
- arbitrage 9y agoBut even if you can see the work, how do you stabilize the microtremors in the artists' hands?
- duncanawoods 9y agoYou can use the equivalent of a mahlstick to guide your tool. Its one of those sticks with padded heads that painters rest their hand on to steady it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maulstick https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maulstick