3 ms·
> Do you really want countries with low outcome equality vs. equality of opportunitity This is a commonly given argument, but does not apply to the US -- it's
by distances 9y ago
> Do you really want countries with low outcome equality vs. equality of opportunitity
This is a commonly given argument, but does not apply to the US -- it's nowhere near a country of equal opportunity. I'd be more open to the argument if you'd include items like no inheritance and no private schooling, to really give a more equal footing -- but I'm guessing these are not up for discussion. Thus, a certain amount of outcome equalizing is absolutely necessary.
- jimmywanger 9y agoIncorrect. One of the highest drives of most human peopls is to make sure that their efforts will benefit their offspring. Once you take that away, whether through inheritance tax or forbidding of public schooling or even presence of more books in the household, what incentive are you giving them to produce? Do not equalize outcome.
- distances 9y agoI think we agree then that equal opportunity isn't realistic, and perhaps even shouldn't be attempted. Thus, please avoid making this kind of simple argument of opportunity vs. outcome, as that's not at all what is being suggested.