35 ms·
Firefox Quantum
- dictum 9y agoFor anyone (like me) who was surprised by FF Beta upgrading from a point release to 57.0: > Note that the merge from beta to release happens ahead of time (usually on the Mon/Tue a week before the release date). https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar
- cjsuk 9y agoMine is 57.0 as well. If you go to preferences there is a "restart to update firefox" button. Whack that after installing the beta and you get the release version. I really like this. I've dumped Chrome and Safari entirely from daily use.
- skrebbel 9y agoI'm very impressed by Firefox 57 (have been on the beta for a while now). I never used Firefox really, but Quantum really made me move over. I still do my dev in Opera simply because I'm used to the dev tools, but if you haven't checked out Firefox Quantum yet, I really urge you to. It's just faster.
- gkya 9y agoUpdated my develper edition FF today, and the first 58 beta came along! I'm impressed it consumes about 300MB of memory only. It's not that much more than when my Emacs has been running for some weeks.
- zaarn 9y agoI've been on Firefox Nightly for a while now and the difference to my FF56 vanilla install, it behaves much more like chrome and has become my daily driver. It can and has fully replaced Chrome (after the KeepassHTTP Connector was ported) in all matters (development, daily usage, hackernews).
- agumonkey 9y agoI used nightly regularly, then stopped. With quantum I used it again. It has shown strong improvements, massive ones, I spent two weeks in nightly. But at point it has perf issues that I don't have with chrome. I'll stay on it for a while to see if it goes away.
- zaarn 9y agoI've found that nightly has some issues with video acceleration (my laptop doesn't like playing anything over 1080p resolution), FF release doesn't seem to have that.
- agumonkey 9y agoI wouldn't rant if it was for intensive usage. But even twitter or the main UI can slow down.
- bzbarsky 9y ago> But at point it has perf issues that I don't have with chrome. Would you be willing to either file a bug report (and cc "bzbarsky") or just describe steps to reproduce here?
- marksellers 9y agoMaybe these are silly things to complain about with fellow techies, but the things that prevent me from switching to Firefox: The menu bars are enormous even on a compact theme. Bigger than on Chrome. I only have so much vertical space to spare. When opening a new window, the address bar isn't the first thing to receive focus, unlike on Chrome. With Chrome, I just bang out WINKEY + C + H + R + ENTER + part of query + ENTER and I'm pretty much there
- imple 9y agohttps://i.imgur.com/hWl9YR8.png https://i.imgur.com/hWl9YR8.png A screenshot from my screen just now, running FF58 and Chrome side by side. Firefox's menu bar is smaller.
- agumonkey 9y agoIt's probably a subjective proportion thing. Pure metrics aren't necessary what people "measure", maybe the border above tabs is not seen as wasted space. Same for perf, Firefox might be faster in tests, but chrome has an overall feel of speed is "better".
- Santosh83 9y agoCertainly not the case as far as opening new tabs goes on my machine, an 1.9Ghz with 4Gb RAM. Firefox opens the new tab instantly while Chrome has a noticeable delay. The same with closing tabs, especially heavy ones. Also Chrome takes just a little bit longer to start than the latest Firefox, although I didn't actually measure this. I think the general perception that Chrome is fast is more a group-think at this point, fostered by a few years of sub-par Firefox performance combined with aggressive Google marketing. There's no real difference since the last few versions of Firefox vs. Chrome.
- agumonkey 9y agoTrust me, I use "old" core 2 machines, right now on a 1st gen i5 and I regularly cringe at firefox, whenever I run chrome, something lifts off my mind. I don't charge firefox, it was resetted non long ago, ublock origin and containers (I removed youtube extensions and the likes). Still twitter hungs enough for me to feel annoyed. I'm not a speed addict, I even love slowness when done right [1], but I rate firefox nightly a little below chrome (stable or canary) at that point. [1] I use an HP48 calculator, the thing was slower in terms of UI than all its competition but it was such a nice ux design you rarely care about it.
- simion314 9y agoI still use the Firefox ESR for the dev tools, the new dev tools are missing things like the network response preview, the debugger is not working right for me, and the Chrome look does not appeal to me, I prefer the old dev tools. Other then this as a user I like the fact the Firefox is moving again and in a right direction most of the time. I hope they respect the user privacy more and the new privacy invading feature should be opt in.
- fiatjaf 9y agoThe old devtools were amazingly slow and heavy. The new ones are much much better. Almost as fast as Chrome's.
- simion314 9y agoFor me the tools worked fine, I prefer the Firefox ESR layout, I prefer FF ESR Network tab, Chrome network tab is too much for my usual tasks, 99% of the time I want to see the response code and the exact response and I do not care about profiling, so Ff way worked fine for me. The JS debugger layout makes more sense for me how it was in Ff, call stack on left side, variables on right side, Chrome call stack view is weird. So I use ESR for dev, hopefully the bugs that affect me will be fixed and the UI changes I could get used to. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353319 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353319
- masklinn 9y ago> the new dev tools are missing things like the network response preview Do you mean the content of the response or something else? Because I'm on FDE and they're definitely there ("Response" tab when selecting a network entry)
- simion314 9y agoI can see the response as plain text but before there was a PReview tab too that showed the response as rendered html, there is a ticket opened for this issue https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353319 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1353319
- ocodia 9y agoI've recently switched from Chrome to Firefox Developer Edition and apart from a few UI niggles, I'm really happy with it and I can't wait to start recommending Firefox to people again. Congrats to Mozilla and the folks who contributed to this! The web needs Firefox and this is a massive improvement.
- Newky 9y agoThis release is amazing, I was slowly moving everything to Chrome from Firefox over the last year-ish. This really changes Firefox. Everything is incredibly snappy, at times more responsive that chrome. The small amount of addons I use are now available. Can't wait to get this by default in Ubuntu.
- Yliaho 9y agoI've recently jumped on the Quantum beta from years of using Chrome, and so far, the experience has been really enjoyable. But please, for the love of everything that is holy, let developers customize scrollbar styles. Thank you.
- jhasse 9y ago> But please, for the love of everything that is holy, let developers customize scrollbar styles. Thank you. Developers, for the love of god, please leave my scrollbars alone. Thank you.
- mariusmg 9y agoI have been using it for 1 month now and have to say Quantum is the first time i have been actually impressed with the speed of a browser. Great job Mozilla, hopefully some Chrome only users will at least try Firefox now.
- deno 9y agoI only wish Firefox would give some love to Mesa. GPU acceleration is still off by default on open source graphic stack on Linux (RadeonSI/Intel).
- thriftwy 9y agoIs this the one that makes you launch Chrome for Hangouts/GoToMeeting/etc? Because why won't you then use Chrome in the first place?
- toomanybeersies 9y agoFirefox has definitely been getting better over the past year or two. I've always used Firefox, since Chrome doesn't have the ability to scroll through tabs, they just get smaller and smaller on the tab bar. I've never understood why the feature hasn't been added, it seems pretty minor. Firefox also lazy loads existing tabs on startup. Anyway, for a while, around 2011-2012, Firefox had terrible memory and stability issues. It's good that they've largely been fixed. Firefox is the most extensible and free browser, I'm surprised more tech people don't use it, considering the tech communities love for power and the ability to customise things.
- dingo_bat 9y ago> I'm surprised more tech people don't use it, considering the tech communities love for power and the ability to customise things. I used to be pretty fanatical about Firefox. But when it got so slow that simple scrolling started dropping frames, I had to switch.
- bjz_ 9y agoThankfully Quantum is silky smooth (been using it on the Nightlies and now the web developer edition).
- Siecje 9y agoThat is because of smooth scrolling. I had to reduce the time for smooth scrolling to complete. I forget the key I modified in about:config.
- Sylos 9y agoSome people do perceive smooth scrolling as annoying, but for the most part what he's referring to was because of JavaScript ScrollEventHandlers being run in between the user moving their mouse wheel and the page actually scrolling. This was fixed with Asynchronous Panning and Zooming (APZ) which moves the webpage and runs the ScrollEvents in parallel on different processes.
- m_st 9y ago
- acoye 9y agoI've been using it (beta) for a while on a win10 desktop. No perf issues to report. Launch time is now on par with others. I'll consider going back from chromium to FF on macOS after the mainstream release. Happy to see some love going on for ff, which I used to love back then, BC (before chrome) era.
- m_st 9y agoI switched to Beta 3 weeks ago just to run version 57 and I couldn't be happier on my Windows 10 machine. Firefox starts much faster, is more responsive and I haven't seen a single crash. However, on my Mac, I really don't like the default black chrome. It just looks as out of place as Firefox always did on the Mac, which is just sad :-( And, I miss Self-Destructing Cookies (SDC). Cookie-AutoDelete (CAD) is fine, but the white list of SDC was automatically shared with Firefox Sync, while CAD settings aren't.
- m_st 9y agoAnyway, congratulations Mozilla already for this great work. I'll try to convert friends and family back from Chrome ASAP.
- pornel 9y agoThe compact light theme looks native enough for me (at least it's so minimal that there's little to offend there ;)
- m_st 9y agoThank you so much! I tried it just now and that's what I'm looking for. Why isn't this the default on Mac? That black bar looks so out of place :-(
- zeotroph 9y ago> I’m sure Firefox 57 will also get a fair share of sour feedback and comments written in uppercase. I might be part of that crowd (though in lowercase) because none of the WebExtensions mouse gesture addons work on macOS/Linux anymore due to this outstanding bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1360278 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1360278 No official dev seems to look into it, and the community patches from the tracker only fix the Linux case.
- saberworks 9y agoYep. I'm not excited about this release at all. Firefox should support gestures natively. Mouse gestures is the only legacy addon I really can't live without so I have turned off automatic updates. Really, it doesn't matter how much faster the new version is if it had to take away so many of the features I've come to rely on over the years. (I have 3 other legacy addons still activated that I really like but that I can live without: classic theme restorer, status 4 evar, and stylish [to control the url bar display, unsupported in the "stylus replacement"].) I have tried Vivaldi but it's not fantastic and it's not open source (but the gestures are more responsive than even the old firegestures). It seems like the new firefox is just racing to be just like Chrome.
- k__ 9y agoSo the "fast" nightly features are now in "regular" Firefox? I tried the nightly a few weeks ago and it would always forget my logins so it was essentially unusable. But the performance was much much better than with Chrome, so I would like to switch to Firefox :)
- dr_zoidberg 9y agoFirefox stable is v56, Beta v57, Nightly v58+. Next week, Stable will be v57, Beta v58 and Nightly v59. v57 is a vast improvement over v56. Can't really say about Chrome because I haven't used it for a while. Main difference between v57 and v58 (performance-wise) is that WebRender (the "Quantum Renderer") didn't make it to v57, so you may want to wait for Beta v58. I've been using the beta channel for years now, it was better than Stable for my browsing habits -- never had an issue.
- konart 9y agoIt'd be great if I could remove this ugly bar at the bottom of url suggestions input field (the one with "Search XXX in..." and search engine icons if any).
- lsmod 9y agoVisit "about:preferences#search" and then uncheck every search engine under "One-Click Search Engines" list.
- konart 9y agoOkay, I'm stupid. For some reason I never even tried to uncked _all_ of them. Always been keeping Google, thinking it should be there for search in the url bar to work. Thanks!
- lsmod 9y agoUse DuckDuckGo as the default search engine, then you can use the "Bang"[0] notation to search using other services. [0]https://duckduckgo.com/bang https://duckduckgo.com/bang
- zaarn 9y agoYou can also go into the Customization Menu and remove the Search Bar there while keeping the search engines.
- mtgx 9y agoFirefox 57 will also allow users to enable Always-on Tracking Protection by default (you could sort of do it before, too, but you had to enable the Private Mode by default, which also deletes cookies and other stuff). This should make it easier for people to enable. It's what Do Not Track should have been all along. We asked advertisers nicely to stop tracking us with DNT, and they didn't care. Now we're going to just block their trackers and there's nothing they can do about it (I'm talking about more mainstream users in general. Of course some of us have already been using ublock origin or similar extensions). https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/firefox-57-to-feature-option-for-always-on-tracking-protection/ https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/firefox-57-to...
- zaarn 9y agoDNT will become legally enforced in the EU soon enough.
- yogthos 9y agoI switched to the beta a couple of months ago, and it's just better than Chrome in every way. It's both faster and seems to have better memory usage.
- SimeVidas 9y agoThe Nighty version will always be the best version ;)
- Sean1708 9y ago> The Nighty version will always be the best version Is that the version I put on just before I'm about to go to bed?
- steveklabnik 9y agoDepends on what time zone you're in; I'm a recent nightly convert, and am currently in a very different TZ than usual. I had gotten used to around when updates would come through, but now I'm all screwed up :)
- fredoliveira 9y agoYou missed the fact that GP was making a joke about a typo ("Nighty" vs Nightly) :-)
- steveklabnik 9y agoGah! You're 100% right.
- werid 9y ago... and almost all my extensions will cease to work. 16 legacy, 4 ready for 57. a few of them i use very often: automatic save folder, save file to, video downloadhelper, downthemall!, search by image for google, image zoom, copy links
- km3k 9y agoYou can switch to Firefox ESR to keep using your extensions and give the extension authors more time. ESR 52 will be supported with fixes until June. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/
- tradesmanhelix 9y agoAnd in June 2018...then what? Sorry - just very tired of people tossing out ESR as a solution to this problem. It isn’t - at best, it just kicks the can down the road. At worst, it’s continuing to support a company that’s shown utter disregard for a huge portion of its user base by the way they’ve handled XUL deprecation. No one’s saying XUL didn’t need to go - it did. What’s frustrating is the complete removal of it without before providing a viable replacement and the accompanying big shrug / middle finger to anyone who relies on XUL-based extensions and can’t switch to the neutered WE version (see Tile Tabs and Tree Style Tab). As a long-time Firefox user, I’m extremely disappointed by the way Mozilla has handled this. I’ll use 57 for dev tools and bookmark sync, but Waterfox or Vivaldi will be my daily driver.
- jhasse 9y agoIf that's the solution, Quantum should have been released just after an ESR. 57 is in between which is just stupid. This has been pointed out to Mozilla multiple times.
- zeveb 9y ago> You can switch to Firefox ESR to keep using your extensions and give the extension authors more time. The problem is that certain valuable extensions are impossible to update, because the new plugin API doesn't expose the necessary functionality. E.g. Keysnail, which will break because Mozilla won't expose the ability to override C-n. Mozilla should have taken the time to release a fully-baked extension API before deleting the old API; then it really would have been on the extension authors. Between this and the utter destruction of Sync's security guarantees a few years back, the Cliqz keylogger fiasco & the Pocket fiasco, as well as the WebRTC fiasco (as well as the defenstration of Brendan Eich), I'm very disappointed in Mozilla these days.
- piyush_soni 9y agoWhile it's going to be a great release (have been trying the Quantum beta on side), I'm very sad to see many of the extremely useful extensions that will just stop working as soon as I switch.
- mistermann 9y agoCan anyone comment.on whether tree style tabs has been ported, or commented on if it will be?
- AndrewHampton 9y agoLooks like it: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tree-style-tab/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/tree-style-ta... I'm using Firefox Nightly and it let's me install it.
- Vinnl 9y agoIt practically has, although they're still working on an API to hide the tab bar - until then, you'll have to hide it by editing a local CSS file.
- Suro 9y agoTree style tab has been ported, it's a version that's a bit rushed but it does the job.
- jhasse 9y ago
- jmarinez 9y agoGo Rust! Sorry, had to say that. Incredible architecture changes were made, but without the language to support them it simply wouldn't have been possible.
- dzaragozar 9y agoHave a look at the Phoronix benchamrk of Firefox 57. Not really impressive. Still a lot of catching up to chrome. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=firefox-quantum-bench&num=1 https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=firefox-...
- m45t3r 9y agoThe problem with benchmarks is that they don't always represent real world performance. Where I work sometimes we have really big PRs (+-5000 lines of code). In GitHub diff pages, the scrolling in Chrome is really jerky, while the scrolling in Firefox Quantum is smooth. And for me this is much more important than some random Javascript benchmark.
- steveklabnik 9y agoOne thing that these benchmarks don't capture is user perceived latency. A lot of work went into this for 57, making it feel faster, regardless of what a microbenchmark may pick up. Of course, work is going into making those numbers better too, but I don't think that this kind of benchmarking tells the whole story. (Also, these mostly seem to be benching JavaScript performance? That's certainly not the whole story of 57.)
- mwill 9y agoI'm not looking forward to this, I realize they've made speed improvements, but the entire reason I'm on FF at all is Tab Groups, which seems to be dead. I know it's not heavily used, but it's going to be painful for me to get used to browsing without it. I'm aware that there's a proposal to add an API to make it possible under the new system, but last time I checked the ticket, recent activity was someone from the team arguing that they'd already agreed it was a bad idea at a meeting, and it simply should not be added. Honestly, I'm going to hang on a legacy version for as long as feasible and then just switch back to Chrome.
- KozmoNau7 9y agoPainful? Nah. Use a combination of windows and tabs to achieve the same grouping. Use the awesome bar to search and switch between tabs, if you need the search functionality. Stop having 100+ tabs open, that's what bookmarks are for. I'm sorry to say that your usage pattern is extremely non-standard and based on the whims of an unpaid extension developer. So you can learn the intended usage pattern for the browser, donate to the extension developer to make him port the extension or create a new extension yourself. Jumping ship to a browser known for privacy issues seems like a really bad choice in this context.
- mwill 9y agoI'm not at the whims of an add-on developer, I'm at the whims of Mozilla. The new extension API doesn't currently have the control required to make Tab Groups, if it did I would port it myself. I won't go in to my usage specifically but windows tabs and bookmarks doesn't work nearly as well as tab groups for me personally. That's how I did it for years before switching to Firefox, and its painful for my workflow. I used Chrome(ium) for years before tab groups got me to switch to FF, if you take away tab groups, I'd rather just go back to it, if for no other reason that principle. Mozilla won me over by having the more flexible browser, that flexibility is going away, I have no loyalty to them beyond that, honestly.
- KozmoNau7 9y ago"That's how we've always done it". AKA the most dangerous phrase in the language.
- sandGorgon 9y agoI have been on Firefox Quantum for the past couple of months. Previously, when I used Chrome on my Dell XPS 13, core i7, 16gb Linux laptop, it used to hang and kill everything almost every week. And suck battery power like no tomorrow. I've not rebooted my laptop in 2 months now and battery life is much much better. Firefox Quantum is pure win.
- kalcode 9y agoThat's the complete opposite of the way Chrome was designed. I've rarely seen Chrome do a complete lock-up and close everything. The point of Chrome spinning up a new process per tab is that when one Tab crashed it doesn't take out the whole browser. Firefox on the other hand did this constantly. In fact the only thing that has prevented me going back, and I have regularly given it a try as I support their overall approach and support of web. So I am excited to see how Quantum feels. But if Chrome was constantly locking up and crashing completely I have to imagine its something wrong with your computer/OS.
- sandGorgon 9y agoChrome hang on Linux is extremely common. Check this out https://www.google.co.in/search?q=chrome+hang+linux&oq=chrome+hang+linux https://www.google.co.in/search?q=chrome+hang+linux&oq=chrom... From what I understand, it has something to do with the way it does memory management along with cache. I don't know - but I have pretty much a flagship laptop and am running Fedora 26 which IMHO is the best OS out there right now. Chrome blows. Quantum rules.
- maturz 9y agoCurrently using both Chrome and Firefox, for me it's quite common that Chrome completely dies no freezing just completely and instantly dying. Maybe at most once every other week but it never really happens with Firefox (maybe once or twice per year).
- rufugee 9y agoWhat's the security story these days re: Firefox v. Chrome? I switched to Chrome a few years ago (for the most part) because, at the time, Chrome was considered more secure. Has this changed?
- bojanvidanovic 9y agoI was heavy FF user back in the day, then switched to Chrome and now I'm back to FF. I've been using beta version for a few months and improvements are massive!
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- coffeeaddicted 9y agosigh I just spend an hour trying to figure out why my emscripten code no longer works. Browsing hacker-news and seeing this post about Firefox. Remembering my Firefox developer edition earlier today mentioned some update on start (FF 58.01b now). And yeah, for some reason it broke some emscripten code (edit: seems now it rather broke WebGL canvas).
- cpeterso 9y agoDo you have a link to a test page that demonstrates the bug? If so, I can file a bug in Bugzilla and identify the code change that caused the regression.
- coffeeaddicted 9y agoSorry, didn't see I got an answer here a few days ago already. Someone else located the bug faster than me and made a bug-report (WebGL being broken - lot of people notice that one ^^). It seems to be fixed already again in nightly, so now it's just waiting for a new developer version to come out.
- 10000100001010 9y agoPost about why I'm not switching to Firefox for those who care to read it. https://davityle.github.io/post/why-im-not-switching-to-firefox/ https://davityle.github.io/post/why-im-not-switching-to-fire... tldr; the devtools are so slow and buggy they are unusable
- jacksmith21006 9y agoFor me no incentive to switch from Chrome. I am a bit lazy and if not broken why increase hassle in switching. Plus when did a while back just switched back to chrome when FF became sluggish.
- onewhonknocks 9y agoI won't be able to continue to use my favorite extension, tab groups, so I don't think I'll be updating in the near-term.
- jhasse 9y ago> I’m sure Firefox 57 will also get a fair share of sour feedback and comments written in uppercase. That’s inevitable. [citation needed]
- bwindels 9y agoI've been running the beta, and it feels so much faster than 56. I also quite like the UI changes they made, quite minimal with everything I need still available. I think this is a great moment for people that stopped using Firefox because of performance issues to give Firefox another go.
- maho 9y agoWill the canvas mouse input lag also go down? I tried to program some small games once and noticed this was horrible on all my (Windows 7) desktop browsers. Just tried again using this demo [1] (not mine!), and now on Chrome it was OK. Edit: I just took the plunge and tested the beta (57.0b14). Unfortunately, the input lag did not go down. I think subtle lags like this cause web-apps to feel so uncomfortable for me. [1] http://jsfiddle.net/Donk/5gXX8/2/embedded/result/ http://jsfiddle.net/Donk/5gXX8/2/embedded/result/
- jhasse 9y agoBefore you comment on that blog post: Any controversial comment will get deleted.
- dreamcompiler 9y agoI use v56 and I've disabled even checking for updates. I'd like to have the performance of v57 but it will break or severely downgrade most of the extensions I use on a daily basis. That's a dealbreaker.
- 0xbear 9y agoTried Firefox recently. Works fine on Linux and macOS, but hangs my Windows 10 cold after a while, requiring a hard reset. Apparently I’m not the only one, and the fix is to disable hardware acceleration. Leaving aside the fact that Windows is garbage, browsers that hope to increase “user happiness” should not do that. Chrome does not.
- tzs 9y agoI started using it about a month ago, because I was getting annoyed with some bugs on Safari [1]. That was on El Capitan, as my Mac was old enough to not support Sierra. I have since gotten a new Mac and am on High Sierra. Firefox has been working well enough that I have not checked to see if those Safari bugs are gone. There are only two things I've found that annoy me on an ongoing basis with Quantum, and two things I wish they handled better. • The English spelling dictionary that comes with it is terrible. You can add a better spell check dictionary from the add-ons page, and that helps. Even with that there are weird gaps, though. Consider these words: millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, picosecond, femtosecond, attosecond. It knows them except for picosecond and attosecond. It seems odd to me to have femtosecond but not picosecond. Chrome knows them all except attosecond. Safari knows them all. Although it does not know picosecond, it DOES know picoseconds. Huh? • I miss the "look up" command on the right-click menus from Chrome and Safari to look up a word in the MacOS dictionary and present the results in a pop-up. I can use the system keyboard shortcut cmd-option-d to open a selected word in Dictionary, but I like the pop-up better. I've got an add-on that adds a lookup to the right-click menu, but that just opens a web-based dictionary in a separate tab. The two things I wished they handled better were certificates and containers/profiles. • Safari and Chrome use Apple's keychain for certificates. If I want to add a non-standard certificate authority's root certificate, or trust a self-signed certificate, all I have to do is import it via Keychain Access and set the trust level and it then works in Safari and Chrome (and Mail and Messages...). Firefox uses its own certificate management, requiring that I add everything to it separately. • Using more than one profile is awkward compared to Chrome. If all you care about is keeping cookies separate [2], Firefox container tabs look like a good alternative, but I also want to keep bookmarks, caches, and history separate, which seems to be beyond what container tabs can handle. [1] There were two that were particularly annoying. (1) When returning to a page via the back button (or corresponding gesture) it would sometimes freeze for a few seconds after it displayed the page. (2) Occasionally it would get in a state where during a back gesture it would freeze in the middle of the animation of the previous page sliding in. I never saw it recover from that. [2] Keeping cookies separate is probably good enough for a large fraction of the things that would drive people to multiple profiles. It suffices for things like checking a work account from home or a home account from work on a service where you have accounts for both home and work.
- arunc 9y agoI was a long time Firefox user (since 2005) and I switched to Chrome 6 months back, because I have a 32 GB laptop and the first thing I noticed was my browser was FAST! But giving openness a thought, the thing that prevents me from going back to Firefox is "Dark Reader" extension[1]. It is just fantastic on Chrome. It would be interesting to see if Firefox gains it's lost trust from the Addon developers like Downthemall. Also Firefox's default black theme doesn't even come close to FT DeepDark addon[2]. [1] https://github.com/alexanderby/darkreader https://github.com/alexanderby/darkreader [2] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ft-deepdark/ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ft-deepdark/