5 ms·
I don't think it's an unreasonable decision to make. It's just one of the least productive things you can do if trying to save money. I'm paying $1400/month fo
by komaromy 9y ago
I don't think it's an unreasonable decision to make. It's just one of the least productive things you can do if trying to save money.
I'm paying $1400/month for a 17.5'x10' room in a popular part of the city. That's almost $2k/month saved by having roommates.
- nilkn 9y agoLiving conditions have a large impact on productivity and general mental wellbeing. For introverts, I think there's an argument to be made that splurging a bit on more space for yourself could lead to better performance in many areas of life. It's hard to put a dollar figure on that. For extroverts, this may be less true. I feel like I should point out that in most of the country, including large cities, it's hard to even spend $2k/month on any apartment, let alone save that much by opting to have roommates.
- liberte82 9y agoI'd agree that having roommates can be made news for a strong introvert, but I don't think the amount of physical space you have is necessarily all that important. It's more whether you can have time to yourself.
- loeg 9y ago> It's just one of the least productive things you can do if trying to save money. ... in SF. In most other cities with many tech employers, NYC excepted, living with roommates instead of in a 1BR isn't going to save you $2k/mo. Median 1BR in Austin or Seattle is less than $2k/mo. Yes, housing is still your biggest cost, but it's so much cheaper than SF, and the taxes are lower than California. The marginal savings you can get by reducing your standard of living aren't as huge as in SF.
- vorotato 9y agoFor the same price you could live in a nicer whole apartment, in most of america. I pay $1200/month for 1664 sqft in a nice townhome, with a garage, next to a park, as a software developer with plenty of opportunities and no I'm not going to tell you where I live or else you'll all move here lol.