> You yourself claimed that designing convincing studies without shortcomings is "straightforward" Yes because - like I said in my other comment - studies on e

> You yourself claimed that designing convincing studies without shortcomings is "straightforward" Yes because - like I said in my other comment - studies on effective teamwork have been done for decades. Point me towards a well cited meta-analysis on the impacts of race and gender diversity where the studies are repeatable experiments involving complex problem solving in a small team. > Similarly, when challenged to provide a design yourself you change the subject. Because you are not acting in good faith. We both know designing a proper study would take at least a couple of months of work. What I have asked from you on the other hand is to provide a link to an existing meta-analyses that supports your claims. For someone who works in this space and claims there is significant evidence this should be a 5-10 minute exercise.