I was arguing using your incorrect assumption that the topic of the discussion was "which one could you live without", and tried to explain that the necessity t

I was arguing using your incorrect assumption that the topic of the discussion was "which one could you live without", and tried to explain that the necessity to live was not the sole criteria for measuring the degree of fundamentality. I myself believe it is just as fundamental as food and shelter, as some people are willing to give up both food and shelter to attain it.