3 ms·
> If it doesn't work well with w3m something is wrong with the site philosophy or execution. Point of clarification: "wrong" according to your moral philosophy
by weberc2 9y ago
> If it doesn't work well with w3m something is wrong with the site philosophy or execution.
Point of clarification: "wrong" according to your moral philosophy about web sites, even if it's one I happen to share.
- xyzzy_plugh 9y agoWhat's the other sort of wrong?
- wastedhours 9y agoBeing objectively wrong. Philosophically wrong is using technology that limits the web from being what the interpreter expected, as in this example (there's still a rational reason in this case to do it the "wrong" way and it's based on personal morality). Objectively wrong being trying to make a website out of custard.