10 ms·
Additionally, what's to gain by making art unavailable to the public? Many of the things these people produced are very high quality artistically. Polanski is r
by SauciestGNU 9y ago
Additionally, what's to gain by making art unavailable to the public? Many of the things these people produced are very high quality artistically. Polanski is responsible for Chinatown for instance.
Limiting the reach of these works ould not be a good thing for society. What we need is a mass critical reevaluation to help us better understand these works in the context of these monstrous artists/producers.
- ksk 9y agoI think it is a bit of a moral gray area. Should one use data from unethical human experiments that were already conducted, and the perpetrators punished (e.g. Nazi doctors)?