Is it really so tricky to just accept this and pay to look after them? People don't want to do that. But one day we may be able to effectively make the argumen

Is it really so tricky to just accept this and pay to look after them? People don't want to do that. But one day we may be able to effectively make the argument that we are paying to look after them one way or the other, and we are currently looking after them with the most expensive possible resources, e.g. first responders, penitentiary, etc. If the argument can be made effectively I think we can get there, but that's the key. You can get people to vote against their ethics & beliefs, but only if you really prove to them that even if it's counterintuitive, you're saving them money.