3 ms·
They'll fork it again. The language used is unsafe, and developers didn't test properly. What can be done? Fork I guess. Or maybe leave the developers develo
by lokerfoi 9y ago
They'll fork it again.
The language used is unsafe, and developers didn't test properly.
What can be done? Fork I guess.
Or maybe leave the developers developing on the Ethereum platform to just fail?
- billmalarky 9y agoWhy would it need to be forked? Couldn't the smart contract language just be upgraded for better security then deprecate DAPPs using the old language?
- lokerfoi 9y agoThey'll fork it to unfreeze millions of funds. It's just funny how decentralized currency is so easily swayed by a few individuals to serve their purpose.
- zeep 9y agothey need to have a majority of mining power moving to the new fork for it to work though...
- shallot_router 9y agoIf they don't fork, everyone affected by this will lose all of their ETH. Many would argue the correct thing to do is to not fork and say that people knew the risks beforehand, etc. But that's what people said last time and they still forked, with no (apparent) severe consequences other than complaining about integrity. Two forks may be harder to justify.
- billmalarky 9y agoAh that makes more sense. I was thinking he was saying they would have to fork for a technical reason not political.
- johnvonneumann 9y agoIt will be forked because they have history of forking when people "lose" funds.
- tom_mellior 9y agoThey have a history of doing this once, and also a history of not doing it in at least another high-profile case.