5 ms·
I'm not sure if I would call a framework that uses jetty under the hood, that micro...
by merb 9y ago
I'm not sure if I would call a framework that uses jetty under the hood, that micro...
- meddlepal 9y agoWhy not? Jetty is pretty lightweight as far as JVM http servers go...
- peeters 9y agoPersonally I don't use macro/micro to describe the bytecode footprint, but rather the API/conceptual footprint. If Jetty is secure and performant, and Javalin keeps it encapsulated, I think micro is a fair descriptor still.
- oaiey 9y agoWell if nancyfx is micro so is Javalin. NancyFX is nowadays built on Kestrel from ASP.NET Core.