3 ms·
Sadly, I've got to disagree with your point of view, and you do seem to have a hugely engineer-y viewpoint on what is "aesthetic". There's a functional aspect
by heavenlyblue 9y ago
Sadly, I've got to disagree with your point of view, and you do seem to have a hugely engineer-y viewpoint on what is "aesthetic".
There's a functional aspect going together with the novelty factor in introducing a new, touchable screen that does not require physical buttons to be controlled - but it is just a matter of driving the wave of what is fashionable today (or well, tomorrow).
The lack of detail _can_ be aesthetic, but it does not mean that something with a huge amount of detail could not be as aesthetic.
Depending on when and where you're introducing your product:
- single-button switch supporting voice control for your lights? Works for me.
- voice-controlled power drill? Not so much (unless it's actually a hired human handling the power drill with his own hands and listening to my commands).
- throwawayjava 9y ago> but it does not mean that something with a huge amount of detail could not be as aesthetic Yes, that's why my initial comment indicated I agree with jmull.