3 ms·
> Was originally a tweet-storm -> https://twitter.com/gravislizard/status/927593460642615296 https://twitter.com/gravislizard/status/927593460642615296, if anyo
by sushibowl 9y ago
> Was originally a tweet-storm -> https://twitter.com/gravislizard/status/927593460642615296 https://twitter.com/gravislizard/status/927593460642615296, if anyone is confused by the stream-of-consciousness style.
I don't mean to detract from the point, but this piece would be helped so much by properly fleshing it out into an article. presenting it as a sequence of 92 tweets is combining the worst of both worlds.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- gumby 9y agoI thought the choice of medium was itself an ironic comment on the crappiness of modern computer usage. Tweetstorms are essentially unreadable, even with a tool like this thread aggregator.
- dredmorbius 9y agoPrecisely my response on first encountering the content. Wherein I discovered that this particular tweet aggregator could be initiated by a third party (others ... cannot). https://plus.google.com/+TimWesson/posts/VSGs2BddARD https://plus.google.com/+TimWesson/posts/VSGs2BddARD