4 ms·
I actually disagree with a fundamental part of your argument. I do believe those living outside city centers are significantly more "freedom loving" than their
by igetspam 9y ago
I actually disagree with a fundamental part of your argument. I do believe those living outside city centers are significantly more "freedom loving" than their city dwelling counterparts. I don't live out here because I can't afford to live in a city, I live out here because I'm afforded more freedom (more free space to move around, fewer lifestyle restrictions, generally fewer regulations, etc) to do as I want. I think the idea of autonomous vehicles or an outright ban on vehicles makes sense in a place like Manhattan. Most of us don't live there and this is a rather sprawling country. Waiting around for an autonomous blob to get to my house when my pig has decided that ant poison is delicious and needs to be rushed to the vet wouldn't work.
If price were a motivating enough factor for people to change, places like SF and Manhattan would be empty.
- rosser 9y agoYou don't value "freedom" more. You value a specific kind of freedom more. Don't conflate the two.
- filesystem 9y agoI think your point would be better served with some elaboration. It seems that you are claiming that you know (based on one paragraph) what that poster values and he doesn't. I don't think I need to explain why that is absurd.