2 ms·
I love all you write. I'm this close to pretending to disagree just to make you argue more :) > If I had a friend and loved him because of the benefits which t
by musage 9y ago
I love all you write. I'm this close to pretending to disagree just to make you argue more :)
> If I had a friend and loved him because of the benefits which this brought me and because of getting my own way, then it would not be my friend that I loved but myself. I should love my friend on account of his own goodness and virtues and account of all that he is in himself. Only if I love my friend in this way do I love him properly.
-- Meister Eckhart
> If a person loves only one other person and is indifferent to all others, his love is not love but a symbiotic attachment, or an enlarged egotism. Yet most people believe that love is constituted by the object, not by the faculty. In fact, they even believe that it is proof of the intensity of their love when they do not love anybody except the "loved" person. [..] Because one does not see that love is an activity, a power of the soul, one believes that all that is necessary to find is the right object - and that everything goes by itself afterward. This attitude can be compared to that of the man who wants to paint but who, instead of learning the art, claims that he just has to wait for the right object - and that he will paint beautifully when he finds it.
-- Erich Fromm, "The Art of Loving" (1956)
- kakarot 9y agoThank you for your kind words. To me that is a compliment of the highest order. I will read the Mark Twain story you referenced in the other post tonight, and will share my thoughts with you on it later. It seems we both see the forest for the trees with this issue, and I appreciate the quotes you've left me. They've given me something to chew on.