I have a few contradictory thoughts on this. On one hand, I really feel Chrome is more on my side than the average webmaster. I don't want bloated websites, I

I have a few contradictory thoughts on this. On one hand, I really feel Chrome is more on my side than the average webmaster. I don't want bloated websites, I don't want autoplay videos, I don't want copy/paste blocked, I don't waste text copying hijacked so that a phrase has a referral link to the article, etc. If Chrome breaks a website functionality to over-write these things, good. The downside is that Chrome is a very big player and by working outside of the system then the rest of the web loses on the spillover benefits. This is hard, committees are slow, bureaucratic and massively resistant to change - and saying fuck it, I'll fix it properly for myself is a lot easier, and I have little patience for it myself. However, in the long ran this is probably better.